The time is right to get into budget hi-fi. From cheap, amazing speakers to a high-quality turntable, it's never been more affordable to get a great-sounding system for vinyl records.
One of the first questions to ask is: How much should I spend if I want the best turntable? Name a price from or up, and there's no doubt you'll find a record player to fit your budget. For example, the Audio Technica LP60 (read the CNET review) is a great little turntable for 0. But there are even better choices for record players out there.
I've chosen 0 as the sweet spot because it opens up the options for finding the best turntable. These record player models are no longer simple toys but can be considered hi-fi turntables: They offer elevated vinyl sound quality and high-quality components. With analog music -- the fact that you'll be constantly removing records, moving the tonearm and spinning up an actual motor -- it's worth spending a bit more for record players that will last.
Note that CNET may get a share of revenue from the sale of products featured on this page.
I also considered record players from the bigger electronics manufacturers -- Sony, Denon, Yamaha -- but didn't find any below 0 that beat the quality of the ones above.
Each of the five record player models I tested has at least something to recommend it, but a couple stood above the rest with solid builds, user-friendly features and excellent sound quality. Let's dive in and check out the top picks for the best turntable under 0.
The Fluance RT82 offers everything you could want except an onboard preamp, so if you have a receiver or amplifier with a dedicated phono input, this is the model to get.
I was mightily impressed by the well thought-out inclusions with the Fluance. Auto-start on/off, adjustable feet and even a little bubble-level were designed with the user in mind.
This high-quality turntable had one of the most entertaining sounds of the bunch, with plenty of insight into recordings as well as a healthy bass kick.
I expected the 0 Pro-Ject Primary (an affordable version of the original Pro-Ject Debut) to perform towards the bottom of the roster: It's the cheapest, the lightest and it has an unusual wooden platter. According to hi-fi folklore "heavier" is supposed to equal "better," so I found it surprising that the Pro-Ject turntable was one of the best sounding. (And if you want even better-sounding, you can pay more for the Pro-Ject Debut Carbon.) It was also one of the easiest to set up. Most of the work was done in the factory -- I just had to attach the belt.
If you can handle its barebones aesthetic and want to save a little money on the Fluance, the Pro-Ject Primary is an excellent choice. You can also upgrade to the version with the phono preamp (also known as a phono stage) for 9, which would make the Pro-Ject even more foolproof.
Arriving in the middle of the pack in terms of both build and sound quality, the Music Hall is a solid turntable at a good price range. It had an even-handed response with all types of music but wasn't as engaging as the Pro-Ject and Fluance tables.
If you're looking to plug a modern turntable straight into any receiver (that is, one that lacks a phono preamp or phono stage) then this is the model we'd opt for.
With its carbon-fiber arm and natural wood veneer plinth, the Audio Technica was my favorite design, but a mixed bag in terms of sound quality for vinyl. The table was the boomiest sounding model when plugged into the same phono preamplifier as the others. When I tested its own preamp it was much less bassy, though also less exciting, and this was presumably due to a better match with the cartridge.
Though the Music Hall's onboard preamp sounded better, the Audio Technica could be the one to get if you want an all-in-one package that also looks great.
There's no denying the U-Turn Orbit Plus looked striking with its red plinth and acrylic platter. I also appreciate that the tonearm has been upgraded from the original Orbit with a new gimbal bearing. While it's better sounding than I remember from the original, the U-Turn couldn't compete with the sound of the others. It sounded truncated with a lack of extended high frequencies, and on the hardware side the lack of a cue lever felt like a glaring omission. Note that you can also get this model with a built-in preamp for more.
If you're just starting out in vinyl, or looking for cheap turntables to give as a gift, the inexpensive Audio Technica AT-LP60 belt-drive turntable is a good option with fully automatic operaton. While I didn't test it directly against the other five, I have listened to it previously. Even with speakers such as the Bowers & Wilkins 606, the LP60 was able to give a convincing and musical performance. Read CNET's review.
Above anything else, sound quality is the main reason to upgrade to a better turntable. Compared to an all-in-one design by the likes of Victrola or Crosley, the lack of integrated speakers means the designers can concentrate on things like better motors and upgraded tone-arms. These are hi-fi components that can stand alongside systems worth many thousands of dollars in a way that a 0 turntable can't.
From left to right: Music Hall MMF-1.3, Fluance RT82, U-Turn Orbit Plus, Audio Technica AT-LPW40WN, Pro-Ject Primary E.
There are four main elements to a turntable: the plinth or base, the platter on which the record sits, the motor and the arm. Both external and internal noise can affect the sound quality of vinyl, and the idea is to ensure that vibrations don't travel from one to the other of these components.
All five 0-ish record players offer a belt-drive design which helps isolate the rumble of the motor from the pickup or stylus. Each vinyl turntable also includes either a removable headshell or at least a replaceable cartridge should you want to experiment with a higher-quality cartridge such as an Ortofon 2M Red.
Some of the turntables offer upgrade options such as an acrylic plinth, which not only looks smarter but may offer a sound quality upgrade too.
It's worth noting that all of the models I tested had a dust cover, but I used (and photographed) them with the lid off. They both look and sound better that way.
While every other aspect of a turntable is damped, the dust cover usually is not. It's a simple piece of plastic designed to keep dust off your vinyl while not playing music, and can reverberate and cause feedback if left attached and the volume is up loud enough.
The Audio-Technica offers a carbon fiber tone arm.
All of these turntables offer a phono-level output -- an unamplified signal that needs RIAA equalization. I plugged them into the phono input on our reference Rotel RA1592 amplifier powering a pair of Q Acoustics 3050i tower speakers.
For receivers and amps that lack phono input, you'll need a phono preamplifier. Our own audiophile recommends the 0 Schiit Mani as a quality budget option.
Two of the models offered a switchable line level output -- the Music Hall MMF-1.3 and the Audio Technica AT-LPW40WN -- and this is handy if you don't have or don't want an external preamp. You can plug these models into anything that accepts RCA inputs. I also plugged these two directly into the amplifier and compared them against each other.
It's worth noting that only two of the five are available outside North America: the Audio Technica AT-LPW40WN and the Pro-Ject Primary. Between the two I recommend the Pro-Ject.
I listened to four different artists from my vinyl collection -- Bob Marley, Slint, LCD Soundsystem and Miles Davis -- on each turntable and compared notes. I listened for bass response (was it boomy, or clean?), midrange detail (low-level instruments and echo effects) and high frequencies (were they recessed or even too loud?). Skip to the appendix at the end to get a deep dive on how the turntables fared with each song.
The Fluance is the over-achiever of the bunch with its polished looks, useful features and involving sound, but the only ones that fall far behind are the Audio-Technica and the U-Turn -- their sound quality can't match the other three.
If you're looking for a more familiar name brand, you'll need to pay a little more. The Denon 300F is well-regarded at 9, the Sony PSH-X500 offers hi-res USB ripping for 9 and audiophile favorite the Rega Planar 1 can be had for 0. But it's arguable whether they would be able to offer sound quality that's markedly better than the Fluance or Pro-Ject -- a test for another day perhaps. In the meantime, happy listening!
If you want to get a greater insight into the performance of each model, here are the notes I took for myself while listening to each turntable with five different songs.
This is the first track I tried on all the turntables. The Fluance offered a warm sound with this track with fine control over the deep bass line.
The Pro-Ject was natural sounding, with a just a smidgeon of bass bloom but the turntable made the instrument sound like a live bass guitar.
This track was my first signal of the Audio Technica's shortcomings. The bass was simply out of control, boomy and unpleasant. However, the midrange offered a good sense of space.
The Music Hall had fuller, less "one note" bass than the Audio Technica. The 'table offered more midrange information than some of the others but this also combined with more surface noise.
Vocals were more forward on the U-Turn, which suggested improved detail but also meant the turntable turned up more surface noise. The bass guitar was deep and relatively supple, but at the opposite end of the spectrum the cymbals sounded clipped, as if it couldn't recreate the high frequency (10kHz and over) information at all.
Compared with the other 'tables the Fluance was better at organizing the sparse scattering of instruments into the space between the speakers. The bass lacked the bloat I heard with the Audio Technica.
The Pro-Ject offered a similar sense of space to the Fluance. However it wasn't able to pick up as much of the narrator's story -- it sounded a little veiled. The track also highlighted some uneven speed issues in the drive; long notes wavered a little.
The Music Hall offered good speed stability but lacked the drama of the leaders. There was lots of high-frequency on display but it wasn't sharp or strident.
The Audio Technica's issues with bass continued with this song's prominent bass. Low-end notes stuck out in a way I hadn't heard before.
The U-Turn turned that abundant high frequency energy into something splashy, but detail retrieval was good. Like the Pro-Ject, there was some speed-related waver with the long guitar notes.
The Fluance turned in an enjoyable, toe-tapping performance, with only a shade too much high hat. If you're looking for something a little more even-handed, the Pro-Ject sounded balanced and prompted a singalong from yours truly. The Music Hall was also balanced with this song.
The Audio Technica offered up bloated bass notes and lots of noise between tracks.
This song was the one that painted the U-Turn in its best light -- while there was some faint bass bloat, the vocals were forward of the mix, and the cymbals sounded naturalfor a change. Maybe this is the DJ turntable for dance-rock fans?
The Fluance could get a little bloomy on bass with more midrange forwardness, but less brightness on ride. It sounded a lot like what I'd heard at the Sony mastering studio previously.
This time it was the Pro-Ject's time to shine as the sound was excellent from top to bottom. The ride cymbal was a little bright but the sax felt like it was in the room.
Again the Music Hall put in a good performance, and the bass sounded balanced with an excellent sense of the performance room. It was a very clean presentation with lots of spatial information on the sax especially.
The Audio Technica and U-Turn both exposed more surface noise on this recording.
Lastly, I listened to the Bob Marley track again with the built-in phono preamps (line-level outputs) of the Music Hall and the Audio Technica. The Music Hall had the better preamp, with a more exciting presentation of the song but the bass threatened to become slightly bloated.
In comparison, the Audio Technica sounded much less exciting, and smaller, less impactful, but at least the bass was not as boomy as it had been through our tests.
Originally published earlier this year. Updated to reflect new prices.B:
包平特一尾赔率多少【滴】【嗒】~ 【滴】【嗒】~~ 【三】【滴】【鲜】【血】【滴】【落】【在】【晶】【莹】【剔】【透】【的】【三】【颗】【万】【吞】【九】【重】【珠】【上】，【瞬】【间】【水】【珠】【表】【面】【赤】【红】【流】【转】。 【即】【没】【有】【结】【冰】，【也】【没】【有】【被】【吸】【入】【水】【珠】【之】【内】。 【呼】~ 【余】【欢】【轻】【轻】【吐】【出】【一】【口】【气】，【看】【着】【旁】【边】【的】【幻】【狱】【情】【花】【道】：“【九】【戒】，【这】【三】【颗】【万】【吞】【九】【重】【珠】【你】【好】【生】【收】【起】，【若】【遇】【危】【急】【应】【该】【能】【帮】【你】【一】【点】【小】【忙】。” 【叽】【叽】【唆】【唆】 【骷】【髅】【花】【冠】
【月】【票】【还】【差】39【张】【加】【更】，【打】【赏】【还】【差】***0【币】【加】【更】！ “【咿】？”【突】【然】，【高】【九】【鼎】【脸】【色】【一】【凝】，【盯】【着】【对】【面】【的】【一】【处】【悬】【崖】，【那】【里】【有】【一】【片】【鲜】【红】【的】【色】【彩】，【仔】【细】【看】，【好】【像】【是】【股】【股】【血】【红】【的】【光】，【在】【迷】【雾】【中】【显】【得】【十】【分】【耀】【眼】。 【靠】【近】【了】【仔】【细】【看】【去】，【高】【九】【鼎】【才】【发】【现】【那】【悬】【崖】【之】【上】，【竟】【然】【有】【着】【一】**【血】【红】【的】【植】【物】，【或】【者】【说】【是】【一】【种】【奇】【怪】【的】【花】【朵】，【而】【且】【很】【像】【是】
【从】2108【年】12【月】31【日】【开】【书】【到】【现】【在】，【很】【感】【谢】【各】【位】【书】【友】【的】【支】【持】。 【在】【这】【里】【想】【感】【谢】【的】【人】【太】【多】【太】【多】，【想】【感】【谢】【所】【有】【人】【的】【支】【持】。 【有】【很】【多】【书】【迷】【说】【大】【结】【局】【太】【快】，【这】【点】【我】【是】【承】【认】【的】。 【也】【想】【跟】【大】【家】【说】【一】【下】，【这】【本】【书】【的】【女】【主】【原】【型】【是】【我】【的】【前】【女】【友】，【其】【实】【当】【时】【分】【手】【时】【就】【想】【结】【束】【这】【本】【书】，【可】【后】【来】【觉】【得】【不】【能】【太】【监】，【就】【一】【直】【坚】【持】【到】【一】【百】【万】【字】
【暗】【渊】【是】【什】【么】，【房】【小】【明】【还】【真】【的】【是】【一】【无】【所】【知】。 【除】【了】【在】【册】【子】【上】【有】【所】【提】【及】，【他】【从】【未】【在】【别】【的】【书】【上】【见】【过】，【更】【没】【听】【人】【说】【过】。 【便】【是】【那】【种】【神】【神】【鬼】【鬼】【的】【传】【说】【中】，【暗】【渊】【也】【从】【未】【有】【过】。 【但】【是】【暗】【渊】【的】【名】【字】，【却】【出】【现】【在】【罗】【浮】【生】【的】【口】【中】。 【房】【小】【明】【看】【向】【罗】【浮】【生】，【问】【道】：“【我】【能】【问】【一】【下】，【为】【什】【么】【叫】【大】【光】【明】【洞】【吗】？” 【罗】【浮】【生】【在】【房】【小】【明】【面】【前】【落】
“【寻】【龙】【分】【金】【看】【缠】【山】，【一】【重】【缠】【是】【一】【重】【关】，【关】【门】【如】【有】【八】【重】【险】，【不】【出】【阴】【阳】【八】【卦】【形】，【坎】【离】【震】【兑】【分】【四】【象】，【乾】【坤】【艮】【巽】【含】【八】【方】，【八】【方】【有】【生】【有】【死】【门】，【山】【泽】【通】【气】【风】【雷】【博】……” 【听】【着】【胡】【八】【一】【朗】【吟】【这】【段】【熟】【悉】【的】【口】【诀】，【何】【邪】【内】【心】【其】【实】【是】【有】【些】【恍】【惚】【的】。 【现】【实】【和】【虚】【幻】，【时】【空】【交】【错】，【到】【底】【哪】【个】【是】【真】，【哪】【个】【是】【幻】？ 【胡】【八】【一】【此】【时】【的】【气】【势】【已】【变】【得】【跟】【完】包平特一尾赔率多少【魔】【仙】【飘】【飘】【然】【从】【空】【中】【落】【了】【下】【来】。 【她】【光】【着】【脚】，【细】【嫩】【的】【玉】【足】【落】【下】，【木】【质】【的】【台】【面】【一】【瞬】【间】【就】【化】【为】【了】【齑】【粉】，【周】【围】【的】【大】【地】【开】【始】【不】【断】【龟】【裂】，【以】【魔】【仙】【为】【中】【心】，【向】【着】【四】【周】【扩】【散】。 【很】【快】，【整】【个】【仙】【岛】【都】【跟】【着】【晃】【动】【了】【起】【来】。 “【你】【若】【是】【来】【贺】【喜】【的】，【我】【非】【常】【欢】【迎】。【但】【若】【是】【来】【捣】【乱】【的】，【哼】……”【苏】【纪】【年】【冷】【哼】【了】【一】【声】，【跟】【着】【一】【跺】【脚】，【原】【本】【晃】【动】【的】【仙】
【韩】【清】【离】【想】【到】【齐】【青】【梧】【拆】【着】【礼】【物】【睡】【着】【的】【样】【子】【便】【轻】【笑】“【郡】【主】【想】【要】【亲】【自】【拆】【礼】【物】，【但】【礼】【物】【实】【在】【是】【太】【多】【了】，【我】【们】【几】【人】【便】【陪】【着】【一】【起】，【最】【后】【实】【在】【是】【熬】【不】【住】【了】【便】【睡】【去】【了】，【这】【才】【回】【来】。” 【韩】【老】【将】【军】【点】【头】，【韩】【夫】【人】【看】【着】【自】【己】【的】【儿】【子】【这】【样】【便】【笑】【了】【出】【来】“【距】【离】【婚】【期】【可】【没】【多】【久】【了】，【你】【得】【好】【好】【的】【准】【备】【准】【备】【了】，【郡】【主】【劳】【心】【万】【名】【也】【该】【休】【息】【休】【息】【了】。” 【韩】
【小】【银】【狐】【呜】【呜】【的】【低】【鸣】【声】【持】【续】【着】，【终】【于】【让】【小】【斑】【不】【耐】【烦】【地】【睁】【开】【眼】，【恶】【狠】【狠】【地】【瞪】【向】【小】【银】【狐】。【小】【银】【狐】【虽】【然】【怕】，【可】【嘴】【里】【呜】【咽】【的】【声】【音】【却】【没】【停】，【最】【后】【小】【斑】【终】【于】【前】【爪】【一】【耙】，【将】【小】【银】【狐】【扯】【到】【了】【身】【边】，【用】【厚】【厚】【的】【长】【毛】【将】【小】【银】【狐】【埋】【了】【起】【来】。 【小】【银】【狐】【被】【小】【斑】【的】【长】【毛】【覆】【盖】，【就】【好】【像】【回】【到】【父】【母】【怀】【里】【似】【的】，【立】【时】【就】【不】【叫】【了】。 【这】【时】【琉】【璃】【也】【分】【好】【药】【草】【了】，
【这】【次】【逛】【街】【之】【后】，【林】【苗】【看】【似】【如】【常】，【实】【则】【暗】【地】【里】【观】【察】【着】。 【眼】【见】【张】【妈】【又】【想】【从】【前】【那】【般】，【全】【身】【心】【扑】【在】【孩】【子】【们】【身】【上】，【这】【才】【松】【了】【口】【气】。 【又】【几】【天】，【罗】【晏】【风】【尘】【仆】【仆】【的】【回】【来】。 【才】【进】【门】，【一】【开】【口】【就】【听】【电】【脑】【房】【里】【传】【来】【一】【阵】【椅】【子】【摩】【擦】【地】【面】【的】【声】【响】。 【侯】【甜】【甜】【一】【溜】【烟】【的】【跑】【了】【出】【来】。 “【你】【回】【来】【了】？” 【她】【两】【样】【放】【光】【的】【跑】【过】【来】。 【罗】